AI readers of mammograms perform similarly to individual radiologists in detecting breast cancer but fall short of the accuracy achieved by multi-reader systems used in screening programs in Australia, Sweden, and the UK, highlighting the need for human-AI collaboration. Using a large dataset from Victoria, Australia, this study simulated AI-integrated screening pathways, showing that AI as a second reader or high-confidence filter can improve sensitivity by 1.9–2.5% and specificity by up to 0.6%, while reducing assessments and human reads. However, automation bias negatively affects multi-reader settings, emphasizing the need for careful design and further research before clinical implementation.
Creator
St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, St. Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, BRAIx Team, University of Melbourne, University of Adelaide
Information
Pediatrics or Adult
Adult
Speciality
Oncology
Modality
Mammogram
Training
3,363,308 mammogram images (from 840,827 episodes- each episode consists of 4 mammogram images)